Essay on Comparison Of Dorian Gray To Lord Henry And...

nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;The Comparison of Dorian Gray to nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp; Lord Henry and Sibyl Vane nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Oscar Wilde’s 19th century The Picture of Dorian Gray portrays a young, naà ¯ve man, Dorian Gray, who begins to change because of Lord Henry Wotton’s negative influence on him; likewise, Dorian influences Sibyl Vane as a result of Henry’s influence on him. Because of Henry’s influence, Dorian’s attitude towards women and his respect for women change for the worse. Because of Dorian’s influence on Sibyl, she commits suicide. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Wilde first portrays†¦show more content†¦nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Dorian meets a young, naà ¯ve girl, Sibyl Vane, who is an actress in a small theatre. Dorian immediately falls in love with her. After a play one night, Dorian gets angry with Sibyl because she does not want to be an actress anymore. â€Å"There’s more to life than just one passion,† says Sibyl. Now that she has met Dorian, she says she will never be a good actress again. Dorian says, â€Å"You have killed my love,† and â€Å"You are shallow and stupid.† Dorian’s influence on Sibyl causes her to be shallow and vain like him. She wants to marry Dorian for his looks and money. Dorian wants to marry her for her beauty and acting. Both Dorian and Sibyl used each other to get what they want. Dorian’s words affect Sibyl so much that she commits suicide. Dorian is also affected by his words. When he goes home that night, he notices â€Å"a touch of cruelty in the mouth,† of his portrait. Dorian’s portrait has begun to reflect his soul. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Lord Henry changes Dorian with the beliefs that morals have no rightful place in life. We know that Lord Henry’s beliefs are unjust because Dorian’s picture is getting more gruesome, not more attractive. Dorian changes Sibyl by making her think that without him she is nothing. The influences on Dorian and from Dorian change him forever. These influences make him a cold-hearted, selfish man who would do anything for what heShow MoreRelatedLord Henry s Manipulation Corrupting Dorian Gray1633 Words   |  7 Pages7, 2017   Lord Henry s Manipulation Corrupting Dorian Gray   In the eyes of Lord Henry, there is no such thing as a good influence, all influence is immoral (Wilde, 8)   meaning that anything being said is neutral; however, that person uses that information is the leading factor of manipulation and corruption.   Lord Henry is the prime instigator and had motive for turning Dorian into a destructive monster, opposite his naturally shy and youthful soul. Author, Oscar Wilde, uses Lord Henry in PictureRead More A Comparison of Oscar Wilde and Dorian Gray Essay1330 Words   |  6 PagesA Comparison of Oscar Wilde and Dorian Gray      Ã‚   One novel that stands out as literary masterpiece is The Picture of Dorian Gray by Oscar Wilde. Wilde wrote a dark tale of a man, Dorian Gray, who destroys his life by exchanging his soul for eternal youth and beauty. The character of Dorian Gray, in many aspects, mirrors the self-destruction of the authors own life. Therefore, Oscar Wilde portrays his own life through Dorian Gray, the main character of the novel. Oscar Fingal O FlahertieRead MoreAestheticism in The Picture of Dorian Gray Essay2257 Words   |  10 Pages The Picture of Dorian Gray, aestheticism is a fashionable belief accepted by society at the time. Oscar Wilde uses the moral deterioration and ultimate destruction of Dorian Gray in The Picture of Dorian Gray to emphasize the negative effects of society’s preoccupation with aesthetics and offer a moral for the reader. In this novel, Oscar Wilde displays Dorian’s moral corrosion negatively in order to convince his audience of the detrimental effects of aestheticism. As Dorian descends deeper intoRead MoreThe Readers Sympathy for Dorian from Wildes The Picture of Dorian Gray2047 Words   |  9 Pagesactions. On occasion an anomaly may be found, where a character is more ambiguous. Dorian Gray’s Actions throughout The Picture of Dorian Gray paralyzes the readers’ ability to condemn Dorian as purely good or purely evil, causing them to be more sympathetic than usual. In the beginning of the book, Dorian seems to be an innocent, charming, beautiful young man, and even referred to as â€Å"a wonderful creation† (ch 2). Dorian is described as this amazing person, with looks comparable to a God, charm thatRead MoreThe Picture Of Dorian Gray By Oscar Wilde1523 Words   |  7 PagesReader Response Entry #6: Chapters 10-11 The Picture of Dorian Gray by Oscar Wilde was not received well by critics when it was published in 1890. This was because it contained themes of homosexuality and was considered scandalous. Now, it is just considered a philosophical novel dealing with morals. I think that this book would very much be viewed as indecent in Wilde’s time. For example, when talking about Dorian’s public image, Wilde writes, â€Å"Society--civilized society, at least--is never veryRead MoreThe Picture of Dorian Gray 1823 Words   |  8 Pagesis the most important aspect of life. In the picture of Dorian Gray, Aestheticism and Hedonism are very active philosophies used by the novel’s characters. Lord Henry influences Dorian to follow these teachings, and as a result Dorian becomes intensely vain and selfish. The portrait is in direct correlation with the immoral influence and the intense vanity. In The Picture of Dorian Gray, Oscar Wilde effectively uses the portrait of Dorian Gray as a symbol to satirize the adverse effects that socialRead MoreThe Picture Of Dorian Gray1680 Words   |  7 PagesAt the height of his success, Oscar Wilde wrote his novel The Picture of Dorian Gray, which follows the life of a young man living in late ninet eenth-century London. The novel shares a similar storyline with that of Wilde’s life, as Wilde wrote it in attempt to justify his homosexuality. The protagonist of the novel, Dorian Gray, enters the story an innocent man, but eventually becomes corrupt due to his need for instant pleasure. Wilde recognizes that the topic of his homosexuality brings up theRead More The Influence of Lord Henry in The Picture of Dorian Gray, by Oscar Wilde2378 Words   |  10 PagesThe Picture of Dorian Gray, concepts such as influence and the origin of evil in Dorian Gray play an exceptionally valuable role in understanding the motives of the characters. Although some critics argue characters such as Lord Kelso significantly influence Dorian’s corruption, Lord Henry Wotton’s toxic personality undeniably impacts Dorian the most. Throughout the course of the novel, Lord Henry remains the ultimate source of evil and uses deception and persuasion to poison Dorian from a naà ¯ve boy

Child Support Enforcement One Law Does Not Fit All Free Essays

Single parents are becoming the norm these days and the government has stepped in to assist these custodial parents to make things fair. It takes two people to make a child so it seems only fair that two people support the child financially, right? I am a single mother. My daughter’s father, Donnie, and I were never married and weren’t together at the time of her birth. We will write a custom essay sample on Child Support Enforcement: One Law Does Not Fit All or any similar topic only for you Order Now He wasn’t around to sign the birth certificate so I had to go through DFS to fill paperwork out to get support payments from him after our daughter (Nathalia) was born. When I filled out the CSE (Child Support Enforcement) paperwork the case was being handled by a caseworker in Jefferson City, MO. I gave the caseworker Donnie’s address about four months after our daughter’s birth. Nothing was done and I assumed they were having trouble getting hold of him. When Nathalia was five years old my case was moved to a caseworker in Columbia who called and got the information from me again and I received paternity paperwork within the month. The way it works is the noncustodial parent only has to pay from the time the paperwork showing paternity was sent. I had tried to contact Nathalia’s father to start visitation. He came around for one hour a week for about two months then just stopped. He paid the arrearage for support payments after facing criminal charges for non-payment of support payments, and being threatened with a year in jail if the support was not paid. I feel no sympathy. Now he is back to not making the payments. On the other hand I have a friend (Jessica, fictional name) who has a five year old daughter (Hannah, fictional name) whose father has been in and out of jail for child support non-payment. He has a relationship with Hannah and has care of her fifty percent of the time. The government wants to put him back in jail for arrearage on Hannah and two of his other children. Jessica has lost her health insurance due to not signing papers that would have him arrested. With these two cases the fathers are very different. One is an absentee father who quits jobs to avoid paying his support payments, the other a father who is very much in his child’s life and is a positive influence. Both fathers are being treated equally in the eyes of the State. But which father deserves the jail time? In an article by Jeff Minerd, â€Å"A Kinder, Gentler Look at ‘Deadbeat Dads’,† he states â€Å"In 1950, about 20% of children lived apart from their father; that figure is now approaching 50%† (8). This article was printed in 1999 so the percentage of children not living with their father has likely increased. The increase is due to many reasons. Some of the reasons may include death, divorce, and never-married couples. With the number of children who do not live with their fathers rising it only stands to reason that the number of cases the CSE (Child Support Enforcement) is handling is increasing as well. According to the Department of Health and Human Services Administration for Children and Families Office of Child Support Enforcement, one of their goals is â€Å". . . to emphasize that children need to have both parents in their lives. . . † (Handbook). If this is true then why is the father who is a positive influence and is present in his child’s life having to deal with the possibility of going back to jail for past child support non-payment, but the father who wants nothing to do with his daughter and doesn’t pay his child support as ordered gets off with a slap on the wrist? Child support enforcement should look more in depth at each case before taking actions against a non-custodial father. The Department of Health and Human Services Administration for Children and Families Office of Child Support Enforcement states â€Å"Although the function of the CSE program is to collect and distribute child support payments, throughout the Handbook [sic]we hope to give the message that children fare best when both parents play an active, supportive role in their lives† (1). The government claims that the actions they take against non-custodial parents are to assist in getting families to work together to make children’s lives better. But according to Jeff Minerd, â€Å"Government enforcement of child support can have the effect of separating fathers from their children† (8). Minerd also states that it is more supported to go after the â€Å"low-income† fathers because it gets the mothers off of State welfare monies. With â€Å"middle-class† mothers it isn’t so supported to go after the fathers because it doesn’t help the State with the amount of money being paid out because they aren’t on welfare (8). So is their mission to help keep families connected or is it to get the money back that they are giving to the low-income families? The first reason CSE should handle these cases case by case is that if actions are taken that cause the father to be resentful it could harm the relationship between the parents and the child. Actions taken by the state can come between the custodial mother and the non-custodial parent. As Cindy Elmore states in her article â€Å"On and On, Over and Over: The Gender War in Child Support Enforcement Court,† â€Å"We’re all crowded together waiting for the courtroom doors to be unlocked, but the women don’t talk to the men, and the men ignore the women† (397). The line of communication between the parents is destroyed by feelings of resentment and arguments that arise from court dates and state demands. Arguments between the parents also harm the child. Even if the parents do not argue in front of the child, the child will still feel the tension and know something is wrong. Feelings of resentment toward being forced to do something may also disturb the relationship between father and child. If the father is arguing about how much to pay and how often with the mother it may cause the father to stop coming around the child. In my situation Nathalia’s dad, Donnie, got upset about the amount and when I couldn’t change it he just cut all contact. The way his support amount was determined was a paper was filled out on the amount of money it took to raise Nathalia. Then the amount I made and the amount he made were taken into consideration. Since I made more my percentage of responsibility was larger. Then they take the percentage left to raise her after subtracting mine and he is responsible for that. So there was nothing I could do to request they lower the payments. We had many arguments relating to this. Another was that he was afraid the State would go after property that he owned. According to the Handbook on Child Support Enforcement liens can be placed on property the non-custodial parent owns in the county (26) and can also take State and Federal Income Tax refunds to pay back child support (29). So it could happen but not if he pays his support payments on a regular basis. When I kept refusing to ask if his payments could be lowered he stopped calling Nathalia and stopped coming to visit her. Second, if a father is active in a child’s life and is a positive influence leniency should be given. Pushing a father to make payments higher than he can make then sending him to jail until it is paid, when he is active in the child’s life, will only harm the child. In â€Å"Child Support Enforcement and Father Involvement for Children in Never-Married Mother. Families† Chien-Chung Huang states, â€Å"Although there are no studies on changes in father-child contact for children in never-married mother families over time, studies find that about one-third of children saw their fathers at least once a month but another third of children had no contact at all with their fathers† (99). If there are such big chunks of the population receiving child support that have similar situations with the non-custodial parent, shouldn’t the different types have different ways of handling the cases? A father that is helping his child with homework every other week shouldn’t be held to the same treatment as a father who has no contact with his child by his own choice. Speaking from experience, I know that if I my daughter’s father was involved in my daughter’s life in a positive way and they had a healthy relationship I would not mind so much if there was a payment missed here or there. A child’s life can be so much fuller with positive influences from both the mother and the father figures in their lives. Third, if the system states that they are trying to get fathers more active in the child’s life through child support enforcement then if they don’t see what is going on before ordering something to be done, they won’t succeed. Jeff Minerd does not think that child support should not be enforced, â€Å"However, the harsh treatment of low-income fathers may make them hostile and resentful of the mothers, children, and government authority† (8). If a low-income father is ordered to pay what the CSE considers to be fair what happens if the father isn’t even making enough to make the payments? Is he to be held to the same standards as a father that keeps quitting his job to avoid making his payments? What if the father gets remarried? According to Hans and Coleman in the article â€Å"The Experiences of Remarried Stepfathers Who Pay Child Support,† â€Å"Remarriage magnified feelings of disempowerment and introduced additional complexities to existing child support arrangements† (613). When fathers remarry it adds more financial responsibility, especially if they have more kids in the new marriage or if there are stepchildren in the marriage. When the Child Support Enforcement Agency takes harsh actions against non-custodial parents it starts a chain of events that can destroy the relationship between the parents. The resentment the father feels for being forced to comply with what the state orders can cause a rift between the father and the custodial mother. In cases like mine it may have caused a rift so large that my daughter may never see her father again. She doesn’t understand why her father doesn’t come and see her any more. A couple of months ago she made up a reason of her own, it was because he was sick. Just last week a new reason came up. She told me he died and that is why he doesn’t come over anymore. I don’t know where she got this but I do know that it is her way of dealing with her feelings. I don’t know what to tell her when she says this. If I tell her that he is alive what reason do I give her when she then asks why he doesn’t see her anymore? Perhaps if the enforcement of the child support was handled differently she would still have a father that was active in her life. How to cite Child Support Enforcement: One Law Does Not Fit All, Essays

The Marshall Trilogy and its Implications on Indian Nations free essay sample

It is this shortsighted revelation hat would prevail throughout western societal perception and cement the subservient role of the Native peoples. The progression of this rhetoric developed within the United States Supreme Court, namely through the opinions of Chief Justice John Marshall. There are three cases, commonly referred to as the Marshall Trilogy that would set forth the framework for federal Indian law, of which would be used to further diminish and scatter the sovereignty of the native peoples. The first of these cases was a property dispute between Thomas Johnson and William McIntosh.The quarrel regarded who possessed proper legal title to land which both men claimed to be theirs. The case was brought before the Supreme Court in 1823 to be settled. Mr.. Johnson had purchased the land from the Epiphanies Indians while Mr.. McIntosh had been granted patent by the United States government. The plaintiffs case was made through the accounting of 200 years of land transactions beginning with the English crown in 1 609 and ending with the holding of the land by that of the Epiphanies Indians and sale to the plaintiff. The defendants case was presented much ore plainly, beginning with the American Revolution were the dependence on the English Crown ceased, therefore any claims held and recognized by Europe were now invalid, making Macintoshs claim the only valid title to the land. Addition claim was made aligning with the public opinion of the day, that Indians were viewed as less than civilized peoples, as such had no legal claim to the ownership of property, subsequently making any land transactions with Indian nations without credibility or legal backing.Chief Justice Marshall ruled for the defendants claim, stating that the grant o lands made forth by Indian could not be recognized in the Courts of the United States, citing that the power of the state (federal government) be the only reason necessary for this decision. (Derrick. ) Tribal nations as a result of this decision had no right Of ownership to their land; they merely had rights to occupancy upon those lands only due to inherent sovereignty which predated the United States.The decision further prescribed a doctrine of discovery would define predisposition for title over lands, which Indian nations could not be provided. Systematically crippling all Indian Nations to a sections of subservience to i ts discovering nation, only granted the rights and powers in which sought fit. The second of these cases directly involved the Cherokee Nation against the State of Georgia. The Cherokee Nation sought review with the Supreme Court to impose an injunction on the State of Georgia prohibiting implementation of certain laws of that state on the Cherokee Nation reservation, citing their own sovereignty as an independent nation not subject to these laws. The injunction was denied and went on to say that the Cherokee nation was not a reign nation, but they were a domestic dependent nation therefore had no cause to file suit against the state government. This result would further outline tribal sovereignty as not that of a state or a foreign nation and subject to the sovereignty of the United States federal government.Thus giving the CSS government the explicit rights to displace tribes from their occupied lands in exchange for a trust relationship assuring basic protection and supplies to tribes upon whatever lands they end up on. Inherent in the concept of a trust relationship is the implication that the tribes are incompetent to Andre their own affairs. This presumption has served as the justification for many actions by the federal government that have intruded on and diminished tribal sovereignty. (Prognosis. The final case within the Marshall Trilogy was the case of Worcester v. Georgia, which was brought forth in 1832. This cases involvement centered on a private individual, Samuel Worcester, whom was preaching on Cherokee land, which was illegal according to Georgia law without possessing a license to do so. The state arrested Worcester who filed suit that the states laws had o authority within Cherokee lands. The Supreme Court agreed, citing that the Cherokee Nation was a distinct community, occupying its own territory, within which the states laws had no force.Although the result in this case can be argued that tribal sovereignty had been reinforced against the states govern meets, it only furthered the powers of the federal government as the guiding hand. Looking back through history it becomes clear that certain injustices have been perpetrated against native peoples at the hands of the united States. Similar to the conquering forces of Rome and Great Britain, eastward expansion was the ideological call that justified the displacement and continued subhuman treatment of native peoples throughout North America.It is clear that upon review of these three decisions an altering view of native people is formulating, from one of complete subservience to one of quasi sovereignty but only under final approval of the federal government. It is this ward to the guardian relationship that has continued to define Indian relations into the modern day, and it is this great disservice that the United States government has left upon the people of every Tribal Nation. A Nation of people explicitly removed from the very meaning of the word used to describe them.The reality faced by Indian Nations is a far cry from the coexistence of colonists and natives that is portrayed when recounting the story of the first thanksgiving. In truth, the native Indians had never been forded the rights of an indepen dent group or society, they were dictated to and diminished for the sake of greed. Perhaps the entirety of American history might be much different if the decisions in these three cases had gone differently, but one can never know.